Legal Opinion
Board of Education of the Independent School District v. Whisman
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1930No. File No. 6677PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■CAMPBEEE, J.
Plaintiff’s amended complaint reads as follows :
“Now comes the plaintiff by way of Amended Complaint and for cause of action against the defendants and each of them, states, complains and alleges:
“I. That the plaintiff at the times hereinafter mentioned was and still is a public corporation, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of South Dakota.
“II. That at the regular school eléction held in said city of Huron, Beadle County, South Dakota, on June 19th, 1923, the defendant H. M. Whisman, was duly elected to the office of Treasurer of the Independent…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Cedartown Cotton & Export Co. v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Continental Insurance v. BairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. YopstIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Gress v. EvansSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Breckweg v. KnochenmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Buck v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Thunder Hawk School Dist. v. Western Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Murdo Independent School Dist. v. LitzenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Murdo Township v. TownsendSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.