Legal Opinion

City of Wessington Springs v. Smith

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1929No. File No. 6637PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The defendant Smith was treasurer of the plaintiff city, and furnished an official bond as such treasurer, executed by the defendant Fidelity & Deposit Company, the condition of which bond was as follows:

“Whereas, Stanley S- Smith was duly appointed city treasurer in and for the city of Wessington 'Springs, state of -South Dakota, for the unexpired) term beginning March I, 1923, and ending May 1, 1924, or until his successor is duly elected and qualified: The condition of the above obligation is such that, if the said Stanley S. Smith shall render a true account of his office, and of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edgerton Independent Consolidated School District No. 2 v. VolzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Independent School Dist. v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Onida Independent School Dist. No. 1 v. GrothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Colomb v. First National BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Independent School District No. 5 v. FritcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Matejka v. ReiderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Lane Independent Consol School Dist. No. 1 v. EndahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Murdo Independent School Dist. v. LitzenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Murdo Township v. TownsendSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API