Legal Opinion

Murdo Independent School Dist. v. Litzenberg

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1931No. File No. 6954PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER 'CURIAM.

This action was instituted by plaintiff school district against defendant, as treasurer of plaintiff district, and appellant, as surety on defendant’s bond as treasurer, to recover of defendant the sum of $9,678.22 and of appellant the sum of $5,000, the maximum penalty of the bond.

The action was tried to the court without a jury, and findings, conclusions, and judgment were in favor of plaintiff against both defendants as jprayed. From the judgment against it, and from a denial of its motion for new trial, the surety company has appealed.

Appellant assigns numerous errors,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Edgerton Independent Consolidated School District No. 2 v. VolzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Durand v. PrestonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Independent School Dist. v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Independent School Dist. v. FlittieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Onida Independent School Dist. No. 1 v. GrothSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Application of KiserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Raphtis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Matter of R.S.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sulzbach v. Town of JeffersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In re R.S.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API