Legal Opinion
Onida Independent School Dist. No. 1 v. Groth
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1928No. File No. 6336PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORIARTY, C.
This action was begun by Onida independent school district to recover from the defendants the sum' of $3,439.27. The complaint alleges the facts as follows:.In June, 1923, the defendant A. C. Groth was duly elected' hr the office of treasurer of the plaintiff district. In August, 1923', Groth qualified as treasurer and assumed the duties of that office, and continued to occupy said office until May 23, 1924, when he resigned. In qualifying for said office, Groth filed a bond in the sum of $8,000, conditioned upon his due performance of the duties of the office of treasurer, and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Joint School District No. 4 v. Bailey-Marsh Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Ladies of the Modern Maccabees v. Illinois Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HaggartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Lovejoy v. IsbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Wessington Springs v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Board of Education of the Independent School District v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
- Thunder Hawk School Dist. v. Western Surety Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Lane Independent Consol School Dist. No. 1 v. EndahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- Murdo Independent School Dist. v. LitzenbergSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.