Legal Opinion

Beaver County v. Home Indemnity Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1935No. 5585PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INDEX.

Issues between Plaintiff and Home Indemnity Co. ................. Page 10 Issues between Home Indemnity Co. and Farnsworth ................ Page 30 Issues between Home Indemnity Co. and Individual Defendants ..... Page 33 Issues between Malia and Plaintiff .............................. Page 51

This case was tried below on a stipulation of facts. Samuel Taylor Farnsworth took office as county treasurer of Beaver county on January 5, 1931. The Home Indemnity Company, in consideration of an annual premium, became the surety of Farnsworth on his official bond after the county commissioners…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  2. United States v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Emmert v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Home Savings Bank v. BierstadtIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance Company v. BarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Johanson v. Cudahy Packing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Martin v. HickenlooperUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Holmstead v. Abbott G. M. Diesel, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Salt Lake City v. SchubachUtah Supreme Court · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API