Ransome-Crummey Co. v. Beggs
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Motion to dismiss appeal on ground that same was not taken within the time allowed by law. Judgment was entered November 22, 1915, an order denying a motion for new trial was entered April 14, 1916, and the appeal was taken April 24, 1916, i. e., within thirty days after the entry of such order. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 939.) The notice of intention to move for a new trial, however, was not served and filed until February 23, 1916, which was more than sixty days after the entry of the judgment, with the result that no proceeding on motion for new trial had been inaugurated or was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bates v. Ransome-Crummey Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Pacific Light & Power Corp v. KauffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Smith v. QuestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Steward v. SpanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Busing v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- First Nat. Bank of Ogden v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.