Legal Opinion

Estate of Hanley v. Hanley

California Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1943No. L. A. 18316PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The First Account and Report in the administration of the estate of Kate Hanley was approved by an order filed on December 12, 1941. A notice of appeal was filed by Katharine G-. Hanley, who, the court determined by the order, does not own money inventoried as property of the estate. Certain legatees under the will of Mrs. Hanley, by a motion to dismiss the appeal, have challenged the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the matter upon the ground that the notice was not filed until February 11, 1942, one day beyond the applicable statutory period.

Katharine Hanley is also executrix of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Estate of SmeadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lawson v. GuildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Lancel v. PostlethwaiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Aspegren Co., Inc. v. Sherman, Swan Co.California Supreme Court · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Laffit Pincay, Jr. Christopher J. McCarron v. Vincent S. Andrews Robert Andrews Vincent Andrews Management Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API