Legal Opinion
Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48J
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 27, 2002No. WCB 97-01397; CA A101276; SC S47320PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
In this workers’ compensation case, claimant sought judicial review of the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) to deny her workers’ compensation benefits. A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed, with one judge dissenting. Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48J, 164 Or App 320, 992 P2d 467 (1999). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and the order of the board.
The following undisputed facts are taken from the Court of Appeals’ opinion:
“Claimant is a substitute instructional aide employed by the Beaverton School…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smothers v. Gresham Transfer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- SAIF Corp. v. WartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Coleman v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- SAIF Corp. v. KolliasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Vigor Industrial, LLC v. AyresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.