Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Nehl

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 21, 1997No. 95-03780; CA A92311PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, SAIF Corporation (SAIF), as the employer’s insurer, seeks review of an order setting aside its denial of claimant’s low back injury claim. The Board held that surgery to repair claimant’s preexisting spine fusion hardware was compensable under ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) because his on-the-job injury constituted the major contributing cause of claimant’s need for treatment for his combined condition. We affirm.

We take the facts from the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) findings of fact, which the Board adopted on its review and which SAIF does not challenge.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48JOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kenimer v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. Gray v. Western Panel Mfg & EBI CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API