Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Kollias

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 3, 2010No. 0605027; A138457PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

The issue in this workers’ compensation case is the operation of the burden of proof when an employer or insurer seeks to establish that a claimant’s “otherwise compensable injury” combines with a preexisting condition to cause a combined condition pursuant to ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) and ORS 656.266(2). SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that, because SAIF had failed to make a prima facie case that claimant had a preexisting condition, the burden of proof did not shift to SAIF under ORS 656.266 and, accordingly, SAIF was not entitled under the board’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Supension of Driving Privileges of Cole v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48JOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Coleman v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Keystone RV Co.-Thor Industries, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Ds Waters of America, Lp v. PrabuckiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Ds Waters of America, Lp v. PrabuckiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API