Legal Opinion
Coleman v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 28, 2005No. 03-02170, 03-05118; A124865PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board holding that he has failed to establish the compensability of a combined condition involving a herniated disc in his lower back. Claimant contends that the board’s order is not supported by substantial reason. We affirm.
Claimant first injured his low back in 1997 while working for the City of Burns. The claim was accepted as a nondisabling low back strain and quickly resolved. Claimant continued to experience episodes of low back and leg pain.
In February 2003, while claimant was employed by Terrain Tamers, SAIF’s insured,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dietz v. RamudaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Dietz v. RamudaOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Tektronix, Inc. v. NazariCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dynea USA, Inc. v. FairbanksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Keystone RV Co.-Thor Industries, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- SAIF Corp. v. KolliasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Bi-Mart Corp. v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Dugas v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.