Legal Opinion

Weyse v. Biedebach

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1927No. Docket No. 4596PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

It appears that on September 28,. 1920, appellants filed the complaint upon which this suit is based, alleging that at all times from July 2, 1903, until March 1, 1913, the Antioak Leather Company was a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the state of California, and that on said last-mentioned date its charter was forfeited for nonpayment of the state license tax; that appellants were the directors of said corporation, and upon such forfeiture they became trustees of the stockholders and creditors of said corporation, and entitled to the possession,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Gray v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Owsley v. MatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Franklin v. MeridaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Zimmer v. DykstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Bernstein v. DodikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Newcomb v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Posey v. Bay Point Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1932

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API