Owsley v. Matson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants have appealed from the judgment within sixty days after its rendition and entry, and the evidence is set forth in a bill of exceptions. The contention of the appellants is that the decision is not supported by the evidence.
The plaintiffs sued to recover possession of two tracts of land, constituting parts of a larger tract of 43.33 acres, all of which is claimed by the defendants. The pleadings are not verified. The answer denies all the allegations of the complaint, and avers that the action is barred by the provisions of sections 318 and 319 of the Code of Civil Procedure.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Walsh v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Hicks v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cavanaugh v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Gray v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Clavey v. LoneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- McGrail v. FieldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
- Wheatley v. San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R.California Supreme Court · 1915
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.