Legal Opinion

Posey v. Bay Point Realty Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1932No. Docket No. S.F. 13578PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

Action to quiet title to some eighty acres of land bordering Suisun Bay. Judgment for defendants. Appeal by plaintiffs.

The court made general findings showing the facts to be substantially as follows: Said land is swamp and tule land fronting the bay, being a part of the Gum Tree Ranch and also of Survey No. 120, Swamp and Overflowed Lands of the County of Contra Costa, conveyed to this state by federal grant in 1850 and by patent to J. E. Durham on June 3, 1893. It comprises approximately what is desig nated the N.½ of the NE.¼ of section 6, township 2 N., R. 1 W., M. D. B. & M. In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Montgomery & Mullen Lumber Co. v. QuimbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Weyse v. BiedebachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Andrus v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Goodrich v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Treager v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Newman v. CorneliusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Everett v. BoschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Kellogg v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Clay v. SauteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API