Gray v. Walker
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to three parcels of land in Alameda County. The evidence is incorporated in a bill of exceptions.
The fifth amended complaint, upon which, with the answer thereto, the action was tried, alleged that on December 23, 1896, plaintiff was seized and possessed of, and ever since has-been and now is the owner in fee simple absolute of the lots in controversy; that on December 23,1896, plaintiff executed and' delivered a deed of said land to the defendant, his uncle, with the understanding that said defendant would reconvey the-same upon…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Allen v. McKay & Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Owsley v. MatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Maguire v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Strong v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- McGrail v. FieldsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.