Legal Opinion

Bernstein v. Dodik

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1933No. Docket No. 8771PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem .

This action was brought by plaintiffs to quiet title to an easement and to enjoin defendants from interfering with and obstructing plaintiffs’ use of same, and for damages. Judgment was rendered for plaintiffs, quieting their title to said easement, permanently enjoining defendants from interfering with or obstructing same, and for $50 damages. From this judgment defendants appealed.

Plaintiffs own lot 49 in Barclay Brown’s 38th Place in Los Angeles, and defendants are the owners of the adjoining lot 48. Robert B. McGaffey and his wife acquired title to lot 48 in 1914 and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. StandleyMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Humphreys v. BlasingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Silva v. HawnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  4. Abbott v. PondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Wells v. DiasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Sinnett v. WerelusIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Causey v. LaniganSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  5. McMorris v. PaganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API