Legal Opinion

The City of Oakland v. Williams

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1940No. S. F. 16406PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an application for a peremptory writ of mandate directing Harry G. Williams, as auditor of the City of Oakland, to countersign and endorse his certificate upon a certain contract for and on behalf of said city, as required by sections 125 and 131 of its charter. The proceed ing comes before us on an agreed statement of facts pursuant to the provisions of sections 1138-1140, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure. Briefly, the parties hereto seek an adjudication of the validity of said contract and of the contemplated expenditure thereunder of some $60,000 for an extended survey of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wyckoff v. ForceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Posz v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Ayres v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Essick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  5. City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API