Rivera v. City of Fresno
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
Plaintiffs, who are utility users in defendant City of Fresno, appeal from a judgment sustaining the validity of a utility users’ tax levied by the city. We are informed that a similar tax has been imposed by some 40 or more cities in this state. As will appear, we have concluded that plaintiffs err in their contention that the city lacked authority to impose the tax. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.
The utility users’ tax ordinance here at issue (Fresno Municipal Code, §§ 4-1001 through 4-1017) imposes a tax (with exceptions not here material) “upon every person using…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Coca-Cola Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. RusterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Weatherford v. City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.