In Re City and County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel Thomas F. Boyle, as auditor of the City and County of San Francisco, to audit and approve a demand allowed and approved by each board and officer of said city whose approval was necessary to its allowance, existing in favor of the County of Alameda in the sum of $5,000 on account of costs and expenses incurred by said county in the preparation of plans and specifications and for the payment of architect’s fees incurred for designing and planning certain proposed units to be added to the tuberculosis hospital maintained by the County of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Koppikus v. State Capitol Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Nickerson v. San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. McCauleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Redevelopment Agency v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- The City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.