Legal Opinion
Ayres v. City Council of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1949No. L. A. 20673PublishedCited by 137 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This appeal is by the petitioner from a judgment denying relief in a mandamus proceeding brought to compel the respondent city council to approve a proposed subdivision map without certain imposed conditions.
A tentative map for the subdivision of 13 acres owned by the petitioner in what is commonly known as the Westchester District in the city of Los Angeles was submitted in October, *331944, to the city planning commission pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (Stats. 1937, p. 1874, as amended, now Bus. & Prof. Code, § 11500 et seq.). The planning commission attached four conditions to which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Dwyer v. City Council of the City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by137 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- ASSOCIATED HOME BUILDERS ETC. v. City of Walnut CreekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- City of Glendale v. TrondsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.