Wyckoff v. Force
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Plaintiff sued in mandamus to compel the defendant Force, as county superintendent of schools, to approve, and the defendant Taylor, as county treasurer, to pay, an order for $7,000 drawn by the trustees of the Salinas Union High School District in part payment for the services of plaintiff as architect in the construction of a new high school building. The complaint alleged that on May 11, 1920, the board of trustees entered into an agreement by the terms of which the plaintiff furnished to the school district plans and specifications for a school building and agreed to supervise and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McBean v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Doland v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Smilie v. Fresno CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Munns v. StenmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- The City of Oakland v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Newton v. BrodieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.