Legal Opinion
Doe v. Department of Corrections
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 2002No. Docket 200810Published
1Opinion of the Court
641 N.W.2d 269 (2001)
249 Mich. App. 49
Jane DOE and Joan Roe, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.
Docket No. 200810.
Court of Appeals of Michigan.
Submitted May 24, 2001, at Lansing.
Decided December 28, 2001, at 9:00 a.m.
Released for Publication March 19, 2002.
Deborah LaBelle and Jeffrey Dillman, Ann Arbor, for the plaintiffs.
Jennifer M. Granholm, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, and Mark Matus, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
Mark A. Cody, Lansing, for Michigan…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. YeskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Frank W Lynch & Co v. Flex Technologies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.