Legal Opinion

Doe v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 2000No. Docket 200810Published

1Opinion of the Court

611 N.W.2d 1 (2000)

240 Mich. App. 199

Jane DOE and Joan Roe, on behalf of themselves and all others primarily situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 200810.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Submitted October 29, 1999, at Lansing.

Decided March 3, 2000, at 9:40 a.m.

Released for Publication March 22, 2000.

Deborah LaBelle and Jeffrey Dillman, Ann Arbor, for the plaintiffs.

Jennifer M. Granholm, Attorney General, Thomas L. Casey, Solicitor General, and Leo H. Friedman and Mark W. Matus, Assistant Attorneys General, for the defendant.

Gayle Rosen and…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. MastersMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re WirsingMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Neal v. CORRECTIONS DEPT.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Doe v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API