Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Raiford

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.

This is a disciplinary case in which the petitioner, Office of Disciplinary Counsel, requests that the respondent attorney, Milton E. Raiford, be disbarred in accordance with the report and recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (board).

In disciplinary cases, our review is de novo; we are not bound by the findings of the hearing committee or the board. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Christie, 586 Pa. 394, 396, 639 A.2d 782, 783 (1994). Nevertheless, we give substantial deference to the findings and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CostiganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChristieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. In re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BentivegnaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EagenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API