Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eagen

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 2004No. Disciplinary Board Docket no. 102 D.B. 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:

GENTILE, Member,

Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Dis*218ciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herewith submits its findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.

I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS

By order of July 29,2003, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania placed respondent, Francis Peter Eagen III, on temporary suspension following his conviction of one count of obstructing administration…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. EilbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ValentinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. In Re EagenCourt of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RaifordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API