Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hawkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2006No. 206 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

The Commonwealth appeals the Superior Court’s order affirming the PCRA1 court’s grant of a new trial to Brian Hawkins (Appellee). The courts below ruled that trial coun*369sel’s decision not to seek a jury charge regarding Appellee’s alibi evidence constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. See Commonwealth v. Hawkins, 848 A.2d 954 (Pa.Super.2004). Both courts construed our decision in Commonwealth v. Roxberry, 529 Pa. 160, 602 A.2d 826 (1992) (Roxberry II),2 to compel such a ruling where an alibi instruction is not included in a jury charge. Rather than contest this…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Commonwealth v. LeskoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API