Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Chung

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

548 Pa. 108 (1997)

695 A.2d 405

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

v.

Daniel W. CHUNG, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 15, 1996.

Decided May 20, 1997.

Harold E. Ciampoli, Jr., Audubon, for Disciplinary Counsel.

Samuel C. Stretton, for Respondent.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

NEWMAN, Justice.

Respondent Daniel W. Chung has filed exceptions to the Disciplinary Board's report recommending his disbarment.

On August 24, 1994, this Court temporarily suspended Respondent from practice based on his July 15, 1993…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SternSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ChungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API