Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bentivegna
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable Chief Justice and Justices of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:
O’CONNOR, Member,
— Pursuant to Rule 208(d)(2)(iii) of the Pennsylvania Rules of Disciplinary Enforcement, the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania herewith submits its *196findings and recommendations to your honorable court with respect to the above-captioned petition for discipline.
I. HISTORY OF PROCEEDINGS
On June 10,2005, Office of Disciplinary Counsel filed a petition for discipline against Antoinette M.J. Bentivegna, respondent. The petition charged respondent with professional misconduct…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. SurrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HolstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RaifordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997