Urias v. Harris Farms, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THAXTER, J.
We hold here that a judge’s failure to respond to or strike an allegedly untimely and legally insufficient statement of disqualification equates to a consent to disqualification pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 170.3, subdivision (c)(4). Under the circumstances here, the statement of disqualification was timely even though not asserted until after the judge granted a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, we reverse that judgment. We also deny the petition of Harris Farms, Inc., for writ of mandate seeking to vacate a lower court order finding that the judge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Cadenasso v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. Christian J.California Court of Appeal · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. PanahCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Church of Scientology v. WollersheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Betz v. PankowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- In Re Arthur U. San Agustin v. Superior Court of Guam, People of Guam, Real Party in Interest, Masatomo Nadeau, Real Party in InterestSupreme Court of Guam · 2024
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.