Legal Opinion

Betz v. Pankow

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1993No. A055091PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16 Cal.App.4th 931 (1993)

20 Cal. Rptr.2d 841

HEIDE V. BETZ, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

CHARLES J. PANKOW, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. A055091.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Five.

June 18, 1993.

COUNSEL

James Duryea, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, Kurt W. Melchior and Claude M. Stern for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

HANING, J.

Appellant Heide V. Betz appeals an order denying her motion to vacate a judgment confirming an arbitration award in favor of respondent Charles J. Pankow, and imposing sanctions against her attorney. She…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Graham v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Church of Scientology v. WollersheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Townsel v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Pazderka v. Caballeros Dimas Alang, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API