Legal Opinion

People v. Panah

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2005No. S045504PublishedCited by 303 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

A jury convicted defendant Hooman Ashkan Panah of the first degree murder of eight-year-old Nicole Parker (Pen. Code, § 187), among other offenses, and found true the special circumstance allegations that the murder was committed while defendant was engaged in the commission of the crimes of sodomy and lewd acts upon a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(17)(D), (E)). The same jury subsequently set the penalty at death. This appeal is automatic. (Pen. Code, § 1239, subd. (b).) We affirm the judgment.

I. Facts

A. Procedural History

Defendant was charged in a…

2Cases cited167 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by303 opinions

  1. People v. DoolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

298 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API