Legal Opinion
Botma v. Huser
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 5, 2002No. 1 CA-CV 01-0003PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
¶ 1 The issue is whether Arizona, which prohibits assignment of a legal malpractice claim, should allow assignment of a legal malpractice claim that is packaged with assignment of a bad faith claim against an insurance carrier. The trial court held that such an assignment of a legal malpractice claim was invalid, and it dismissed the complaint. We affirm.
I
¶ 2 In reviewing the grant of a motion to dismiss, we accept as true all well-pleaded facts, and we give plaintiffs the benefit of all inferences arising therefrom. Johnso6 v. McDonald, 197 Ariz. 155, 157, ¶2, 3 P.3d…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company v. LeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. GuerreroArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Webb v. GittlenArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Himes v. Safeway InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Hayden Business Center Condominiums Ass'n v. Pegasus Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.