Himes v. Safeway Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 We examine in this opinion 1 the burden of proof and legal standard applicable in determining to what extent a Damron/Morris agreement 2 represents a reasonable settlement that is binding on an insurer.
i.
¶ 2 Holly Castaño (“Castaño”) was severely injured in an automobile accident. Without attempting to fully describe her injuries, we note that Castaño suffered a diffuse axonal injury to her brain which resulted in spastic quadreparesis. 3 She has no use of her left arm or leg. She can slightly move her right leg and has limited use of her right arm. She has…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Damron v. SledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Safeway Ins. Co., Inc. v. GuerreroArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- PUEBLO SANTA FE TOWNHOMES OWNERS'ASS'N v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Parking Concepts, Inc. v. TenneyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- A Tumbling-T Ranches v. Flood Control DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.