Legal Opinion

Webb v. Gittlen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 2008No. CV-07-0127-PRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BALES, Justice.

¶ 1 Under Arizona law, an insurance agent’s clients may assert claims for professional negligence against the agent. We hold that clients may assign such claims to third parties.

I

¶ 2 In 2000, Neal and Gail Berliant bought a liquor store called The Liquor Vault. To insure themselves, they purchased a business and umbrella liability policy from Victoria Gittlen, a licensed insurance agent. Gittlen then worked for G & G Insurance Service; she later moved to CDS Insurance Agency. The Berliants allege that Gittlen did not advise them that they could also purchase liquor…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  3. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Goodley v. Wank & Wank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Robert Charles Towery v Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  2. Lofts at Fillmore Condominium Association v. Reliance Commercial Construction, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. 1800 OCOTILLO, LLC v. WLB Group, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Associated Insurance Service, Inc. v. GarciaKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API