Legal Opinion

Damron v. Sledge

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1969No. 9662PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, justice:

Clyde and Eileen Damron, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, brought an action against Pies Sledge (hereinafter referred to as Defendant Sledge) and Perel Polk (hereinafter referred to as Defendant Polk) to recover damages for personal injuries. “allegedly sustained as the result of an automobile collision wherein Defendant Sledge negligently and carelessly drove Defendant Polk’s vehicle into plaintiffs’ vehicle.” From a written order of the trial court granting Defendant Polk’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Critz v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Dan Smoot v. Honorable Noel P. Fox, United States District Judge for the Western District of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  3. O'Dowd v. American Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. American Casualty Company v. George W. TimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  5. Hatfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GandyTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. United Services Automobile Ass'n v. MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Fund v. HelmeArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Red Giant Oil Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API