Legal Opinion

Straus v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 22, 1917No. 1569; No. 1570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Cross appeals from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7710 (T. D. 35314).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

These cases are cross appeals from a decision of the Board of General Appraisers touching the classification of cotton yarns of various grades and sizes. The Board divides the merchandise into two primary *416classes: (1) That which is used to execute the embroidery design on the face of the fabric; (2) that which is used to lock the embroidery stitch on the back of the fabric. This seems to be a suitable and sufficient division for the purpose of deciding the main issues raised by the appeals.

Assessment of the merchandise at appropriate rates according to the sizes of the yarns was made under…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. JacksonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. Sheldon & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  4. United States v. SchumacherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Loeb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Pacific Overseas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API