Legal Opinion

Knauth v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 3, 1915No. 1472PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 36495 (T. D. 34774).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise in question consists of imitation mohair astra-khans composed of jute and cotton. It was assessed for duty at the minimum rate of 47|- per cent ad valorem under paragraph 325 of the tariff act of 1909, which paragraph provides various rates of duty on the following: “Plushes, velvets, velveteens, corduroys, and all pile fabrics, cut or uncut whether or not the pile covers the entire surface.” The protest claims the goods to be dutiable at 45 per cent ad valorem either under paragraph 332, as manufactures in chief *129value of cotton, or under paragraph 358, as manufactures in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re HerrmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1893
  2. In re HerrmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1892
  3. In re DowningU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. United States v. MurphyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Straus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. Tilton Textile Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  5. United States v. Jules Raunheim Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API