Legal Opinion

United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 25, 1928No. 3080PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBland, Judge

The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. entered at the port of Baltimore for the account of Mitsui & Co. (Ltd.), of New York, a shipment of alloy from India. It was designated in the invoice as ferromanganese and entered at the rate of 1% cents per pound on the manganese content under paragraph 302 of the Tariff Act of 1922 for ferroman-ganese containing more than 1 per centum' of carbon.

Following instructions from the Treasury Department the collector liquidated the entry at 1% cents per pound on the manganese content plus 15 per centum ad valorem, as manganese silicon.

The appraiser’s report reads…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Acker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  5. Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moscahlades Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Carborundum Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
  3. United States v. Frank Samuel & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API