Legal Opinion

Wanamaker v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 11, 1925No. 2510PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbee, Judge

Paragraph 1420 of the Tariff Act of 1922 contains, among others, the following provisions:

* * * articles of wearing apparel of ever}1' description partly or wholly manufactured, composed wholly or in chief value of hides or skins of cattle of the bovine species, or of dog or goat skins, and not specially provided for, 15 per *94centum ad valorem; articles of wearing apparel of every description wholly or in part manufactured, composed wholly or in chief value of fur, not specially provided for, 50 per centum ad valorem.

The question here is whether dyed kid-skin jackets should be assessed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Acker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. United States v. OberleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. United States v. JacksonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  5. Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API