Draeger Shipping Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBlaND, Judge
Paragraph 1420 of the Tariff Act of 1922 reads as follows:
Purs dressed on the skin, excepting silver or black fox furs, not advanced further than dyeing, 25 per centum ad valorem; plates and mats of dog and goat skins, JO per centum ad valorem; manufactures of furs, excepting silver or black fox, further advanced than dressing and dyeing, prepared for use as material, joined, or sewed together, including plates, linings, and crosses, except plates and mats of dog and goat skins, and articles manufactured from fur, not specially provided for, 40 per centum ad valorem; silver or black fox…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swan v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Acker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Bloomingdale Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. JacksonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Monroe-Goldkamp Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. F. W. Myers & Co.United States Customs Court · 1950
- Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
- Sunde v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.