Legal Opinion

United States v. Sheldon & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1914No. 1372PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 34779 (T. D. 34186).

1Opinion of the CourtBaebee, Judge

The merchandise involved in this appeal was invoiced’as bar-le-duc red currants and was assessed at 1 cent per pound and 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 274 of the tariff act of 1909 as preserved fruit. This assessment was protested by the importers, who described the merchandise in the protests in the same language employed for that purpose in the invoice and claimed that it was dutiable as jellies at 35 per cent ad valorem under the same paragraph.

At the hearing before the board the importers called no witnesses. One, an examiner of merchandise at the port of Chicago, testified on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Goldberg's SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  2. United States v. OberleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
  4. Bogle v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wanamaker v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  4. Straus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API