Watson v. York Metal & Alloys Co.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge
The merchandise involved in this appeal consists of “tungsten steel scrap.”
*451There is some conflict in the evidence as to the exact form of the material, the examiner, Hyder, contending that it consisted largely of pieces of broken tools, while the importer insists it consisted of lathe turnings. The sample offered in evidence is of the latter material. The material was gathered from various steel mills in England and was the waste arising from the manufacture or repair of high-speed steel tools. Testimony introduced by the importer showed the merchandise to have a tungsten content of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. WalterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Ball v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Monticelli Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- Brown v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Starkey v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Lamont v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Edgar Allen Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Edgar Allen Steel Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.