Legal Opinion
State v. Ham
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 4, 2000No. SC 16244PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, the state of Connecticut, instituted this action, pursuant to General Statutes § 18-85a,1 § 18-85a-2 of the Regulations of Connecticut State *567Agencies,2 and General Statutes § 51-298,3 seeking to recover from the defendant, Eric Ham, the assessed cost of his incarceration and the cost of public defender services provided to him.4 The state’s complaint seeks damages in the amount of $1,872,461.50, which represents the state’s total cost for incarcerating the defendant through his earliest eligible parole date and the cost of his public defender services.
The state filed an…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Ham v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Ransom v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Greenberg, Rhein & Margolis, Inc. v. Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- F & W Welding Service, Inc. v. ADL Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Hospital of St. Raphael v. New Haven Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Sullivan v. ThorndikeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Williams v. MarinelliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Rafferty v. Noto Bros. Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Feldmann v. SebastianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.