Legal Opinion
Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 29, 2002No. AC 21980PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendants Benistar Property Exchange Trust Company (Benistar Property), Benistar, Ltd., and Daniel E. Carpenter appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the application filed by the plaintiff, Gail A. Cahaly, for a prejudgment remedy.1 On appeal, the defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) granted the application because the prejudgment remedy statutes, General Statutes § 52-278a et seq., do not contemplate a plaintiff, in an out-of-state action, attaching a defendant’s Connecticut assets prior to the entry of judgment in the out-of-state case,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Angelo Tomasso, Inc. v. Armor Construction & Paving, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- E. J. Hansen Elevator, Inc. v. StollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Morris v. Cee Dee, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Mountview Plaza Associates Inc. v. World Wide Pet Supply, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.