Legal Opinion
Rafferty v. Noto Bros. Construction, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 26, 2002No. AC 21131PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CRETELLA, J.
The defendants, Noto Brothers Construction, LLC, and Anthony Noto and Heidi Noto, appeal from the order of the trial court granting the application for a prejudgment remedy filed by the plaintiffs, Dennis Rafferty and Eugenia Rafferty. The defendants claim that the court improperly (1) permitted the plaintiffs to proceed on an application for a prejudgment remedy that failed to comply with the prejudgment remedy statutes, General Statutes § 52-278a et seq., in that it failed to set forth the amount of the remedy requested as required by General Statutes § 52-278c (b), (2)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coleman v. Conservation Society of Southern Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roundhouse Construction Corporation v. Telesco Masons Supplies Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Burton v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Morris v. Cee Dee, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Kendall v. AmsterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.