Legal Opinion
Feldmann v. Sebastian
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 1, 2002No. SC 16651PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly denied the application of the named plaintiff, Donna K. Feldmann (plaintiff),1 for a prejudgment remedy and the appointment of a receiver to collect certain tribal incentive payments furnished to the defendants, Keithkalani Sebastian and Juanita Graham, as members of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation (tribe). On appeal, the plaintiff claims, inter alia,2 that she is authorized to pursue her applica*723tion for a prejudgment remedy and the appointment of a receiver pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-278a* *3…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Hillman v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Chapel-High Corp. v. CavallaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Neptune Park Assn. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Bernhard-Thomas Building Systems, LLC v. DunicanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Terracino v. Fairway Asset Management, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. Sunrise Herbal Remedies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.