Legal Opinion

Ham v. Greene

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 4, 1999No. SC 15806PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KATZ, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly refused to set aside the jury verdict holding the defendants, New Haven police department detectives Joseph Greene and Michael Sweeney, liable for common-law malicious prosecution and false arrest claims and federal civil rights claims brought by the plaintiff, Eric Ham. After the jury found in favor of the plaintiff on each claim, the defendants filed a motion to arrest judgment, to set aside the verdict, to direct a verdict in their favor or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or, in the alternative,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hi-Ho Tower, Inc. v. Com-Tronics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  2. Shay v. RossiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  3. Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. State v. WhipperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API