Legal Opinion
Greenberg, Rhein & Margolis, Inc. v. Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 26, 1991No. 14159PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The only issue on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying an application for a prejudgment remedy. The plaintiff, Green-berg, Rhein and Margolis, Inc., brought an action against the corporate defendant, Norris-Faye Horton Enterprises, Inc., and the individual defendant, Faye T. Horton (Horton), to recover the balance due on insurance premiums paid by the plaintiff. In conjunction with the filing of this complaint, the plaintiff sought to attach real property personally owned by Horton. After a hearing held pursuant to General Statutes § 52-278d,1 the trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- New England Land Co. v. DeMarkeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Dow & Condon, Inc. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- TIE Communications, Inc. v. KoppSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. FeldmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Vezina v. Nautilus Pools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Bosco v. Arrowhead by Lake, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.