Legal Opinion
Citizens for Hatton Canyon v. Department of Transportation
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 17, 2003No. H024449PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
Assembly Bill No. 434 (2001-2002 Reg. Sess.) 1 directed the California Department of Transportation (DOT) to transfer approximately 130 acres located in the Monterey-Carmel area, known as Hatton Canyon, to the Department of Parks and Recreation (Parks) for use as a state park. (Stats. 2001, ch. 136.) Article XIX, section 9 of the California Constitution 2 authorizes the transfer of surplus state property located in the coastal zone to Parks for state park purposes. However, only 24 of the 130 acres of the Hatton Canyon property actually he within the coastal zone boundary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Kaiser v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Department of Corrections v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Coalition of Concerned Communities, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Neilson v. City of California CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Brookside Investments, Ltd. v. City of El MonteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- County of Butte v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- County of Butte v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.