Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Hopkins

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1936No. L. A. 15439PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

We granted a hearing in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Two, because the decision of the appellate court was in conflict with the decision of another appellate district in Dooley v. Johnson, 133 Cal. App. 459 [24 Pac. (2d) 540]. In said case a petition for hearing in this court was not filed. After careful consideration we are of the view that the opinion of the District Court of Appeal in the instant case, written by Mr. Justice Wood, contains a correct statement of the law, and we therefore adopt said opinion as our decision. It…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Merchants’ and Manufacturers’ Bank v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Miller v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. San Pedro, L.A. & Salt Lake R.R. v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Western Reserve Life Insurance v. MeadowsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API